Pictory vs InVideo Affiliate Program
Compare Pictory and InVideo affiliate programs by current status, monetization model, commission, attribution, operational terms, audience fit and source evidence quality.
Choose by audience and product fit first. The table exposes operational terms only where they are actually stored from first-party research; missing terms remain blank rather than being guessed.
| Factor | Pictory | InVideo |
|---|
| Current status | Source conflict | Active |
| Category | AI Video Tools | AI Tools |
| Model | partner-source-conflict | sale |
| Commission | Source conflict: current partner marketing page advertises recurring commissions up to 50%, while the current affiliate signup page states 40% one-time commission on the first payment | 50% on the first billing cycle of qualifying monthly plans; 25% on the first billing cycle of qualifying annual plans |
| Cookie / attribution | Verify current partner portal | 120-day click referral window; a signup attributed during that window can remain associated for a later paid upgrade under the current rules |
| Approval | Affiliate/marketing-partner application | Free to join and currently described as open to everyone |
| Verified / reviewed | 2026-09-08 | 2026-09-07 |
| Best fit | AI-video, content-repurposing and creator-software publishers willing to verify the live offer before promotion. | AI-video publishers, YouTube educators, short-form creators, marketing creators and agencies. |
Pictory
Pictory currently publishes conflicting first-party affiliate economics: its partner marketing page promotes recurring commissions up to 50%, while its live signup page says 40% one-time on the first payment. This profile preserves the conflict instead of choosing the more attractive figure.
Visit programInVideo
InVideo runs its AI-video affiliate program through Impact. The current program pays a one-time percentage on the first billing cycle and uses a long published referral window.
Visit program