Skyscanner vs Booking.com Affiliate Program
Compare Skyscanner and Booking.com affiliate programs by current status, monetization model, commission, attribution, operational terms, audience fit and source evidence quality.
Choose by audience and product fit first. The table exposes operational terms only where they are actually stored from first-party research; missing terms remain blank rather than being guessed.
| Factor | Skyscanner | Booking.com |
|---|
| Current status | Active | Active |
| Category | Travel Tools & Services | Travel Tools & Services |
| Model | revenue-share | qualified-booking |
| Commission | Flexible percentage of the commission Skyscanner receives from its supply partner on qualifying referral activity | Commission on qualified bookings made through approved affiliate integrations; current public page does not publish one universal rate |
| Cookie / attribution | 30 days | Verify current CJ/region-specific program terms |
| Approval | Application through Impact; current page lists site-quality and traffic requirements for web affiliates | Free registration plus affiliate-network/advertiser approval |
| Verified / reviewed | 2026-09-08 | 2026-09-08 |
| Best fit | Established travel websites with booking-comparison content and measurable traffic. | Hotel, destination, itinerary and travel-planning publishers with booking-intent traffic. |
Skyscanner
Skyscanner’s current affiliate page uses Impact, a 30-day referral data window and a flexible revenue-share model based on the commission Skyscanner itself receives. It also publishes meaningful site-quality requirements instead of presenting approval as automatic.
Visit programBooking.com
Booking.com currently offers a travel affiliate program that publishers access through its supported affiliate-network flow. The public program page confirms commission on qualified bookings but does not present one universal commission rate for every region or product.
Visit program