Home / Comparisons / Skyscanner vs Booking.com

Skyscanner vs Booking.com Affiliate Program

Compare Skyscanner and Booking.com affiliate programs by current status, monetization model, commission, attribution, operational terms, audience fit and source evidence quality.

Choose by audience and product fit first. The table exposes operational terms only where they are actually stored from first-party research; missing terms remain blank rather than being guessed.
FactorSkyscannerBooking.com
Current statusActiveActive
CategoryTravel Tools & ServicesTravel Tools & Services
Modelrevenue-sharequalified-booking
CommissionFlexible percentage of the commission Skyscanner receives from its supply partner on qualifying referral activityCommission on qualified bookings made through approved affiliate integrations; current public page does not publish one universal rate
Cookie / attribution30 daysVerify current CJ/region-specific program terms
ApprovalApplication through Impact; current page lists site-quality and traffic requirements for web affiliatesFree registration plus affiliate-network/advertiser approval
Verified / reviewed2026-09-082026-09-08
Best fitEstablished travel websites with booking-comparison content and measurable traffic.Hotel, destination, itinerary and travel-planning publishers with booking-intent traffic.

Skyscanner

Skyscanner’s current affiliate page uses Impact, a 30-day referral data window and a flexible revenue-share model based on the commission Skyscanner itself receives. It also publishes meaningful site-quality requirements instead of presenting approval as automatic.

Visit program

Booking.com

Booking.com currently offers a travel affiliate program that publishers access through its supported affiliate-network flow. The public program page confirms commission on qualified bookings but does not present one universal commission rate for every region or product.

Visit program