140 Essay Sentence Starters Examples

Claim: One reason the policy produces uneven results is that local implementation varies widely.

Evidence integration: In the 2025 survey, respondents who used the service weekly reported fewer missed appointments than occasional users.

Explanation: This difference matters because frequency of use changes how quickly users learn the booking system.

Qualification: Although the sample is small, the pattern is consistent across all three participating clinics.

Contrast: By contrast, the second study measured intention to use the service rather than observed behavior.

Example: For example, rural participants often depended on one weekly bus, making a single cancellation more consequential.

Significance: Taken together, these findings suggest that reliability may matter more than route count for time-sensitive trips.

Transition to limitation: A second issue is whether the reported improvement persists after the initial training period.

Also, the effect was smaller for first-time users.

Additionally, the effect was smaller for first-time users.

Furthermore, the effect was smaller for first-time users.

Moreover, the effect was smaller for first-time users.

In addition, the effect was smaller for first-time users.

Similarly, the effect was smaller for first-time users.

Likewise, the effect was smaller for first-time users.

Another point is, the effect was smaller for first-time users.

Equally important, the effect was smaller for first-time users.

Besides, the effect was smaller for first-time users.

However, the effect was smaller for first-time users.

By contrast, the effect was smaller for first-time users.

In comparison, the effect was smaller for first-time users.

In contrast, the effect was smaller for first-time users.

Yet, the effect was smaller for first-time users.

Nevertheless, the effect was smaller for first-time users.

On the other hand, the effect was smaller for first-time users.

Instead, the effect was smaller for first-time users.

Conversely, the effect was smaller for first-time users.

Even so, the effect was smaller for first-time users.

Therefore, the effect was smaller for first-time users.

Thus, the effect was smaller for first-time users.

As a result, the effect was smaller for first-time users.

Consequently, the effect was smaller for first-time users.

Because of this, the effect was smaller for first-time users.

For this reason, the effect was smaller for first-time users.

Accordingly, the effect was smaller for first-time users.

So, the effect was smaller for first-time users.

Hence, the effect was smaller for first-time users.

Which means that, the effect was smaller for first-time users.

For example, a writer might show that the pilot improved completion rates.

For instance, a writer might show that the pilot improved completion rates.

Specifically, a writer might show that the pilot improved completion rates.

To illustrate, a writer might show that the pilot improved completion rates.

As an illustration, a writer might show that the pilot improved completion rates.

In particular, a writer might show that the pilot improved completion rates.

Notably, a writer might show that the pilot improved completion rates.

One example is, a writer might show that the pilot improved completion rates.

A clear case is, a writer might show that the pilot improved completion rates.

This can be seen in, a writer might show that the pilot improved completion rates.

Admittedly, the effect was smaller for first-time users.

Despite this, the effect was smaller for first-time users.

Granted, the effect was smaller for first-time users.

Still, the effect was smaller for first-time users.

To be sure, the effect was smaller for first-time users.

Despite that limitation, the effect was smaller for first-time users.

All the same, the effect was smaller for first-time users.

That said, the effect was smaller for first-time users.

Importantly, the effect was smaller for first-time users.

Above all, the effect was smaller for first-time users.

Especially, the effect was smaller for first-time users.

Notably, the effect was smaller for first-time users.

In fact, the effect was smaller for first-time users.

More significantly, the effect was smaller for first-time users.

The key point is, the effect was smaller for first-time users.

Most of all, the effect was smaller for first-time users.

Crucially, the effect was smaller for first-time users.

What matters most is, the effect was smaller for first-time users.

Overall, the effect was smaller for first-time users.

In summary, the effect was smaller for first-time users.

Ultimately, the effect was smaller for first-time users.

Taken together, the effect was smaller for first-time users.

In conclusion, the effect was smaller for first-time users.

On balance, the effect was smaller for first-time users.

In short, the effect was smaller for first-time users.

In the end, the effect was smaller for first-time users.

The evidence therefore suggests, the effect was smaller for first-time users.

The larger point is, the effect was smaller for first-time users.

In most cases, the effect was smaller for first-time users.

Under these conditions, the effect was smaller for first-time users.

To some extent, the effect was smaller for first-time users.

With one important exception, the effect was smaller for first-time users.

In this context, the effect was smaller for first-time users.

For this population, the effect was smaller for first-time users.

Within this scope, the effect was smaller for first-time users.

At least in the short term, the effect was smaller for first-time users.

More cautiously, the effect was smaller for first-time users.

Subject to verification, the effect was smaller for first-time users.

In the same way, the effect was smaller for first-time users.

By the same logic, the effect was smaller for first-time users.

Just as importantly, the effect was smaller for first-time users.

In both cases, the effect was smaller for first-time users.

A similar pattern appears, the effect was smaller for first-time users.

The same distinction applies, the effect was smaller for first-time users.

Correspondingly, the effect was smaller for first-time users.

In parallel, the effect was smaller for first-time users.

Also, the later replication found a weaker relationship.

Additionally, the later replication found a weaker relationship.

Furthermore, the later replication found a weaker relationship.

Moreover, the later replication found a weaker relationship.

In addition, the later replication found a weaker relationship.

Similarly, the later replication found a weaker relationship.

Likewise, the later replication found a weaker relationship.

Another point is, the later replication found a weaker relationship.

Equally important, the later replication found a weaker relationship.

Besides, the later replication found a weaker relationship.

However, the later replication found a weaker relationship.

By contrast, the later replication found a weaker relationship.

In comparison, the later replication found a weaker relationship.

In contrast, the later replication found a weaker relationship.

Yet, the later replication found a weaker relationship.

Nevertheless, the later replication found a weaker relationship.

On the other hand, the later replication found a weaker relationship.

Instead, the later replication found a weaker relationship.

Conversely, the later replication found a weaker relationship.

Even so, the later replication found a weaker relationship.

Therefore, the later replication found a weaker relationship.

Thus, the later replication found a weaker relationship.

As a result, the later replication found a weaker relationship.

Consequently, the later replication found a weaker relationship.

Because of this, the later replication found a weaker relationship.

For this reason, the later replication found a weaker relationship.

Accordingly, the later replication found a weaker relationship.

So, the later replication found a weaker relationship.

Hence, the later replication found a weaker relationship.

Which means that, the later replication found a weaker relationship.

For example, a writer might show that the first study reported a strong association.

For instance, a writer might show that the first study reported a strong association.

Specifically, a writer might show that the first study reported a strong association.

To illustrate, a writer might show that the first study reported a strong association.

As an illustration, a writer might show that the first study reported a strong association.

In particular, a writer might show that the first study reported a strong association.

Notably, a writer might show that the first study reported a strong association.

One example is, a writer might show that the first study reported a strong association.

A clear case is, a writer might show that the first study reported a strong association.

This can be seen in, a writer might show that the first study reported a strong association.

Admittedly, the later replication found a weaker relationship.

Despite this, the later replication found a weaker relationship.

Granted, the later replication found a weaker relationship.

Still, the later replication found a weaker relationship.

To be sure, the later replication found a weaker relationship.

Despite that limitation, the later replication found a weaker relationship.