AI Character Brainstorming Template 1
Canon-first brief: fixed facts → [ ]; unresolved character problem → [ ]; story constraint → [ ]; relationship constraints → [ ]; details AI must not invent/change → [ ].
Start with structure, then replace every placeholder with information that is true, relevant, and natural for your context. These templates are intentionally skeletal so your final writing does not sound mass-produced.
A strong AI-assisted character brainstorming session produces multiple meaningfully different possibilities that can be tested against the story's conflict, theme, setting, existing canon, and character agency. The writer should be able to explain why the retained traits change behavior and plot rather than merely making a profile longer.
Canon-first brief: fixed facts → [ ]; unresolved character problem → [ ]; story constraint → [ ]; relationship constraints → [ ]; details AI must not invent/change → [ ].
Option comparison: possibility → [ ]; motive/fear/obligation → [ ]; changed choice under pressure → [ ]; relationship consequence → [ ]; plot consequence → [ ]; keep/reject and why → [ ].
Contradiction test: stated value → [ ]; competing need → [ ]; situation that forces a choice → [ ]; likely behavior → [ ]; cost → [ ]; what this reveals without explanation → [ ].
Continuity handoff: accepted canon → [ ]; rejected possibilities → [ ]; unresolved questions → [ ]; next scene pressure → [ ]; verification/research needed → [ ].
Publication-readiness audit for AI Character Brainstorming: claim/advice/example → [ ]; strongest available source tier → [ ]; important disagreement or uncertainty → [ ]; what would change the conclusion → [ ]; publish now / qualify / revise / hold → [ ]; final verifier or source of truth → [ ].
Provenance and classification audit for AI Character Brainstorming: draft statement/example → [ ]; classify as fact / interpretation / recommendation / convention / original example → [ ]; source or internal provenance → [ ]; source date / version / checked date → [ ]; attribution needed → [ ]; recency risk → [ ]; final publishable wording → [ ].
Source-record and update audit for AI Character Brainstorming: statement / example → [ ]; external fact, project fact, interpretation, recommendation, convention, or original example → [ ]; controlling first-party / primary source → [ ]; secondary source if used → [ ]; source record / locator → [ ]; date or version checked → [ ]; update trigger → [ ]; publish / qualify / revise / hold → [ ].
Source-ledger and revision-history audit for AI Character Brainstorming: claim / recommendation / example → [ ]; source or project record ID → [ ]; source status active / superseded / corrected / retracted / retired → [ ]; claim-level last verified date/version → [ ]; event that triggered recheck → [ ]; correction / withdrawal action → [ ]; reader-facing disclosure needed? → [ ]; what changed and why → [ ]; prior wording/version retained at → [ ].
Claim/source status audit: Item [claim/source/example] | Status [active / review due / stale / corrected / retracted / superseded] | Controlling source/version [x] | Last verified [date/version] | Stale trigger [x] | Correction severity [0–3] | Reader disclosure [none / note / correction / withdrawal] | Changelog entry [what changed + why].
Dependency and propagation audit: Claim / example / recommendation [x] | Controlling source / project record [x] | Dependency strength [direct / shared / advisory / independent] | Review trigger / reason code [x] | Needs-review scope [local / direct dependents / cluster] | Replacement source requirements [x] | Carry-forward decision [x] | Propagation targets [x] | Reader disclosure / changelog action [x].
Persistent editorial registry audit: Topic slug → [ ]; claim UID/key → [ ]; source UID/key → [ ]; dependency UID + strength → [ ]; source status/version → [ ]; open review UID/reason/priority → [ ]; replacement source if any → [ ]; reviewer + resolution → [ ].